The news: GenAI was pitched as relief from busywork—faster drafts, cleaner code, fewer routine tasks. An eight-month Harvard Business Review field study of a 200-person US tech firm revealed a more complex outcome.
The study shows that AI adoption was mostly voluntary and employees leaned in even when AI use wasn’t mandated. The result: Work sped up, responsibilities multiplied, and AI-assisted tasks spilled into more hours.
Productivity rose, but so did work intensity.
Why it’s worth watching: AI’s productivity gains are real—and broad. More than three-quarters (77.1%) of US full-time desk workers said AI tools make them more productive, per EisnerAmper.
Nearly half (46.5%) reported being somewhat more productive, and 30.6% say much more productive. Just 1.9% reported being less productive, while 20.4% saw no change. The upside cohort outweighs the downside by roughly 40 to 1.
That gap underscores how AI is changing the tempo of work. Quicker turnarounds raise the baseline for employee responsiveness and output expectations.
Implications for marketing teams: As AI adoption grows, sustainable gains will hinge on workflow orchestration, not just access to the latest models.
Teams redesigning workflows around AI will benefit over those that simply layer it on without adjusting output expectations.
You've read 0 of 2 free articles this month.
One Liberty Plaza9th FloorNew York, NY 100061-800-405-0844
1-800-405-0844sales@emarketer.com