As programmatic ad spend rises in the US, so does the amount wasted due to supply chain complexities and made-for-advertising websites.
For consumer packaged goods (CPG) company Georgia-Pacific, those inefficiencies were a catalyst to bring programmatic advertising in-house.
“We found that the CPMs were typically higher when we worked with an agency, and there were a lot of hidden costs that we didn’t have as much transparency into,” said Paras Shah, senior director of digital media at Georgia-Pacific.
By moving in-house, Georgia-Pacific aimed to cut supply chain fees, improve effectiveness, and strengthen integration with brand, creative, and retail media teams.
But the decision was not just about saving money—it was about control.
“We thought we would have a lot more control and a lot more agility in how we set up campaigns, how we measure them, and how we make optimizations,” Shah explained.
For example, Georgia-Pacific shifted from exclusion to inclusion lists to better control where its ads appear.
Putting strategy into motion required the right partner—and for Georgia-Pacific, that was Yahoo DSP.
The bottom line: For brands with tightening budgets, Georgia-Pacific’s example shows that in-housing—paired with curation—can deliver efficiency and quality.
Although the transition comes with hurdles—from attracting specialized talent to determining the most effective optimizations—Shah said the benefits are worth the challenge.
“We were able to break down the entire media supply chain to get maximum value on the programmatic vehicle,” he said.
You've read 0 of 2 free articles this month.
One Liberty Plaza9th FloorNew York, NY 100061-800-405-0844
1-800-405-0844sales@emarketer.com